Friday, February 28, 2014

A project I'm currently working on...

...a pair of old flip flops. To be new again... :)


You may be wondering what those buttons are for: they're going underneath the slits and the straps will be attached to them.
The beadwork technique is two-drop diagonal peyote. I've actually never seen that anywhere before, at least not two-drop and diagonal combined - but it's pretty straightforward to do if you know either so I don't think I can claim to have invented that. ;)


The left one is already finished!





My latest finished project was this birthday gift for a friend.
I'm also currently working on a dream catcher, both it and the flip flops will be added to my deviantART gallery when finished.

Sunday, February 23, 2014

At Winter's End

Fortunately this hasn't been a bad winter - after four freak winters in a row with tons of snow, it's been back to the Rhineland's standard with very cold temperatures and bitter nights of frost but generally no snow; in fact I haven't seen a flake this year and am grateful for it as for someone depending on a bicycle for transportation,snow always is a major issue.
With the snow drops and crocuses already in blossom everywhere, spring seems close at hand now and I'm looking forward to Nature's reawakening and to new adventures out there.

Reminiscing last year's trips, I've been looking through my photos of them.
Here I am in Amsterdam at the Museum Plein, with my rented MacBike behind me. (And no, I can't ever be around anywhere without a bike!)


From Amsterdam I passed through Haarlem on the bike...


...on my way to the shores of the North Sea, about 15 miles from Amsterdam.


~~

At a later occasion, I went on a short trip to a little town called Bad Münstereifel in the nearby Eifel hills. It's just about 30 miles from home but going uphill a lot, so it takes a strong woman and a good bike. :)
I stayed two nights at a youth hostel on a hill top overlooking the picturesque town with its nice historic buildings.

Here I'm sitting on top of the tower of the ancient city wall.


Overlooking the town of Münstereifel from the tower.


And watching the sunset from the hill outside the youth hostel.


~~

And not least, there are really awesome places much closer to home, too!
Like the lakes in the woods near Brühl, just about 10 miles from here...



...as well as my beautiful Rhine river, the Seven Hills, and many more places. Can't wait for spring!


Flea market.  :)


Sunday, February 16, 2014

We Are Constant Flux

I somehow didn't bring the previous entry to the full conclusion I had intended since I wanted to get it posted on the relevant day... so I uploaded my Bela Jaws instead.
I picked up a few more points in the meantime, such as someone saying one should always search inside oneself because what really matters is the self which would be sought in vain outside or in someone else, and that they had found themselves to be the soulmate they had previously been looking for. I tend to agree with this. I've said for a long time: Don't ever make your own happiness depend on anyone else.
Yes, I know well this may be easier said than done, even for someone generally not very susceptible to the emotion of love.  (As I already admitted previously, it's a sweet shark who got me. And it would indeed be very hard to be happy without him.)

A question that came up in a discussion was, if the death of the body is not the end of individual existence but a mere transformation, as I have suggested, and if so much of what we feel is determined by brain chemistry and the brain being left behind as part of the body, then how much of the person I was would really be left?
I pointed out that if you're at least a child old enough to read this then none of the atoms in your body are the same ones you were born with. Even the entire human skeleton is completely replaced about every 7 years or thereabouts, and of all the cells in your body only about 10% are actually human - the rest are bacteria that live in and on our bodies forming a microbiome which is indispensable for our health (for instance, we need the bacteria in our intestines to digest our food, and the natural flora on our skin helps fend off harmful molds and germs). Our bodies can be seen as large colonies of cells in a continual state of dying and being replaced. Even our DNA can be altered by our choice of lifestyle. And also the matter that makes up our brains is in constant flux, it is merely the pattern which is for the most part maintained. The only thing relatively constant about the person we are is nothing physical, it is our personality, and even it can and does undergo changes over time.
At least this much I can grant the materialists: We truly are impermanent indeed, at least in the way we are today - not because we will cease to exist though but because we are constantly evolving patterns.

What do I really still have in common with the little girl I once was?
In the process of our learning and development we will inevitably change our views on many things over time. My personal changes were particularly radical. Initially appearing as a rather quiet and obedient child enduring my oppression in silence,I burst out into total rebellion very suddenly at age 11. Somewhere deep inside this spark of Luciferian rebellion had always slumbered though. For instance, I remember when I was in elementary school our class once went to see a theater play, I think it was "The Wizard of Oz". I barely remember the story but only the evil witch in it; I later asked my mother to go and see the play once more - because I had fallen in love with the evil witch and wanted to see her once more. I also remember drawing a picture of myself and the witch holding hands. She had shaggy, fiery red hair and wore a red dress.
Whenever I fell in love later it would always be some evil characters or beings - and to clarify, "falling in love" for me always meant the same innocent infatuation, there was never anything sexual about it, to this day.
It is this attraction to the Darkside, to some evil characters - later as a teenager it would be Freddy Krueger from "A Nightmare on Elm Street", and I still love him, as a very good friend - which I still recognize the most as being myself when looking back at that little girl I was.

But apart from that, what is the one thing that has really always remained constant throughout my life? The one thing that defines me as distinctly myself, standing completely apart from anyone else in the world?
My consciousness, the experiencing self. Ever since I was born I've been looking out at the world through these same eyes and never through anyone else's - at least not in waking life. These eyes are part of my body and the body will eventually be left behind. But I mentioned waking life because dreams are an exception. I still experience looking out at some world each night - while my eyes are actually closed and my body motionless and asleep in the darkness. At that moment I am unaware of my sleeping body in the darkness though, I experience sights and sounds and communications pretty much the way I experience them in waking life, even if under changed rules, with the dream environment readily reflecting back my inner state of thoughts and emotions.
This is the one thing that never changes and whose existence we cannot doubt: the experiencing self. This is who we are and always will be, no matter how our physical body changes - and I really mean no matter how: not only whether you dye your hair a different color or you gain or lose a lot of weight, but even if you could completely alter your shape and turn into, say, a bird - you would still know this bird is you because you would still be experiencing from the perspective of your unique self.

It is for this very reason that I have a so passionate interest in dreams, because of their quality of reflecting back our inner state. In certain ways dreams are a safer environment to interact with: if you happen to get run over by a bus, although it may be horrifying, you will most likely simply wake up. In certain other ways the waking world is a safer environment though: your thoughts are your very private matters, no one else can spy on them or let alone act on them except yourself. In a dream however, whatever you think or feel will quickly manifest and take on a life of its own. Dreams are therefore a great training ground for gaining better control of the state of our selves, something I'm not good at and still require a lot of training in. I stated before that "stress is caused by giving a shit" and I maintain that anyone who doesn't accept me as I am can go and f*** off because I don't need them. But apparently I still allow myself to be bothered too much by people, as evident from my dreams. I'm mostly able to cope to some extent; in the lucid dream I related a while ago where the streets were full of crowds who bullied me I was at least able to kill them by throwing lightning bolts, so I kept the upper hand - but I'd have preferred they hadn't been there at all and I'd have been able to do something completely different instead.
A person who fortunately doesn't bother me any longer in waking life is my mother - we've been out of contact for years and both the happier for it - but in dreams she's still a frequent intruder. The other night I tried to send her this video of a pooping shark to state my opinion but, as typical for technology in dreams, it didn't work. LOL

Friday, February 14, 2014

Happy ANTI-Valentine's...

You guessed it, I got no love lost for love. Having repeatedly ranted about the ignorance of the materialist dogma lately, it's about time to take on the other side of the line I'm walking.
I came across a video today that had an interesting title but turned out to be dealing with some extraterrestrial conspiracy baloney and of course the tinfoil-hatters loved it. And one of the comments claimed in all capitals that "love is the ultimate truth and everything else is illusion." Well, sorry to disappoint you kids, the exact OPPOSITE is much closer to the truth!
Like it or not... time to take apart LOVE!

And brace yourselves because science is on my side. I was surprised the article even compares love to addiction just as I've always seen it - ok, it says it "shares some of the neural underpinnings with addiction." And to be honest, "as I've always seen it" isn't quite true, it's more like "ever since I've been an adult warrior and gained insight into life" I've been able to see this. There were times when I did feel lonely and was looking for love in a way. At least I thought it was love I was looking for when really it was just friendship and appreciation. I didn't understand then that "love" between humans usually involves mating behavior. It took me a very long time to understand this since I don't have any mating instincts myself and I didn't realize just how much different I am in this from 99% of the general population. I still don't really know why I'm so different in this - just lucky? - then again, there is no such thing as coincidence... but that's a different topic.

Being this different gives me a great advantage in my quest though, it's a truly immense burden I do not have to wrestle. Love makes you blind, it leads you astray and it ties you to the human world.
It actually is a function of your organic body, it's brain chemistry, it is indeed very much like a drug addiction.

Someone I know who has been suffering a lot from depression said to my puzzlement that they uphold the view of materialism just because of the reason that they hope to just "rest in peace" after their physical death, that there will be nothing. Myself, vehemently refusing to ever cease to exist, I would have thought one might simply hope for the suffering to end, but not one's entire existence. Yet I do know very well what depression means, having spent my entire teenage on the brink of suicide. But this person is considerably older than I am even now and I would have thought they would also have realized that there is more to existence... What I mean is, depression is for the most part caused by faulty brain chemistry. It may or may not have been first induced by external factors like a horrible childhood (as in me), and even when these external causes have been removed the brain chemistry remains the way it got used to over all the years of suffering.

The way I'd put it: You are not your body, and so you are not your suffering. But it may be hard to make this understandable to anyone who does believe they are their body.

Love is the same way. I guess most people enjoy love and therefore they would protest to even try to see my point. Even more they enjoy the obscene, physical part of it, sadly, the part entirely tied to their animal biology. Only when their love causes them suffering, as the New Scientist article talks about, might they consider they'd better be without it.

Of course, the "mating" kind of love is not the same as the "divine" kind although they're sometimes and in some traditions even seen as related. I certainly want nothing to do with the former but nor with the latter.
There are certainly things I love in my life - I love sharks, I love spring, riding my bike, blue skies and beautiful things - but that's something different, it's just personal preferences and appreciation. When I love something it means I have positive feelings for it, and when I hate something I feel negative toward it. Both equally define my personality. For instance, I love serene nature landscapes and hate crowded events - if it were the other way it wouldn't be me! I need both my love and my hate (and many other things) to define my personality but neither my love nor my hate are things that exist independently from me, just as my running doesn't exist unless I'm running, and my dreaming doesn't exist unless I'm dreaming. Knowing one's preferences is good... but one should at all times try to stay in control of them. For instance, if there were a preference for a certain type of food which is unhealthy then I'd certainly adjust my preference to exclude this food.

~~

This being said... ok, time to confess I do sometimes like to cuddle up with someone I truly love. I do like the feeling of a soft fin stroking my face...

Yes, I said a fin.

A shark fin.






I love my sweet Bela Jaws. <3 br="">

Tuesday, February 11, 2014

Help needed to save my friends from getting murdered!

You may or may not have heard about the plans of certain scumbags in the government of Western Australia to murder endangered Great White Sharks and other shark species whom they consider a possible threat to humans. I feel very strongly for these creatures, they are my totem and closest relatives to me, I often thought I may be the soul of a shark who was born into a human body.
But regardless how you feel about them, you should know that scientists estimate there may be as few as 3500 Great White Sharks left in the world oceans. Yes, in the WHOLE WORLD!! This number equals about 1% of the human population of Bonn, the city I live in. Other shark species are not much better off, and a beautiful tiger shark has already been murdered by the disgusting criminals lately!

So I'm asking everyone's help here, below I've collected a list of petitions, all of them in the same matter: Don't murder these endangered sharks!
I'm NOT asking that you must sign all of them (although I've made sure to have signed every single one of them myself!), just sign as many or as few as you have time or patience for, even if you sign just one of them that's much better than none. It costs you nothing, GUARANTEED, except for a few seconds of time.
If you'd like to help more you can spread them on Facebook or Twitter or elsewhere.
A big THANK YOU to all who signed, went to protests or helped in any other manner to stop the murder of sharks!!!

http://www.thepetitionsite.com/964/102/507/we-demand-the-shark-cull-in-western-australia-cease-now/

http://www.nosharkcull.org/petition

http://www.thepetitionsite.com/413/191/395/stop-the-shark-cull/#sign

http://action.hsi.org/ea-action/action?ea.client.id=104&ea.campaign.id=25320&ea.tracking.id=facebook

https://secure.avaaz.org/en/petition/Premier_of_Western_Australia_Colin_Barnett_Stop_the_Shark_Cull_by_removing_the_baited_drumlines/?fbss

http://www.marineconservation.org.au/petitions.php/9/save-wa-sharks-stop-the-cull

http://www.thepetitionsite.com/840/990/131/stop-the-australian-shark-cull/#sign

http://ccwa.org.au/nosharkcull

https://www.greenpeace.org.au/action/?cid=60

http://www.change.org/petitions/the-australian-senate-prevent-proactive-killing-of-white-sharks-in-australia-2

http://action.seaturtles.org/p/dia/action3/common/public/?action_KEY=14910

http://www.thepetitionsite.com/804/980/433/urgent-stop-western-australias-sharks-from-being-culled-urgent/

http://www.communityrun.org/petitions/stop-the-wa-government-culling-sharks

http://www.thepetitionsite.com/684/070/893/keep-ban-on-killing-of-great-white-sharks/

http://www.thepetitionsite.com/274/566/776/save-the-great-whites-of-western-australia/

Sunday, February 9, 2014

Walk the Line

In a dream I had it was said that time is an illusion and that all there really is is an endless series of "now".

The nature of the universe is not coincidence, yet nor is it determinism. Then what is it? What we all are, perhaps to varying degrees... Consciousness.
I was pointed today to this very interesting article although I must add the caveat that the website it is found on seems for the most part quite a bit on the tinfoil-hatter side, with its "UFO News" section and the very dubious headlines in the "Latest News" ticker, and also, I have to disagree with the headline of this article itself, "Quantum Theory Proves Consciousness Moves To Another Universe At Death," in particular with the word "proves". If there actually were any proof then this whole debate would be over; neither in this article nor in Robert Lanza's book which I read nor anywhere else is there anything that would constitute any solid evidence for the existence of the soul and for consciousness being fundamental - but of course, neither is there any evidence against it. This has its cause in the very nature of scientific evidence which usually means some physical evidence, and the extreme difficulty to find physical evidence for something non-physical. Science can't even give proof for the existence of consciousness itself, yet few scientists would dispute that it does exist and that they themselves are conscious beings.

This is the thin line I have to walk, this path along a narrow ridge, to one side lies the wasteland of materialist dogma in denial of all meaning to life, and to the other side the kingdom of tinfoil hatters where folly and superstition rule over the gullible; they ought to be observed from afar in order to define the borders of the narrow path, but both sides are to be avoided at all costs.

As for Robert Lanza's book, it is very controversial indeed, most people rated it as either totally brilliant or the absolute pits. Some of the former may be from Tinfoil Hat Kingdom and most of the latter likely from Dogma Wasteland. As you may have guessed I share neither opinion, I didn't experience it as life-changing as the overall idea wasn't entirely new to me at all, but it was certainly not bad either. I must admit the critics have a point in saying "Biocentrism" is not a science book - it's more philosophy than science, but then, what else could be expected when it's about the ultimate question? One point of criticism I don't understand at all though is that Dr. Lanza is telling much about his own life along the way which in my opinion helps to relate to his way of thinking about life, it's really well written and thought provoking so I can't see why someone wouldn't have the patience to read about these more personal chapters.

I certainly recommend the two videos accompanying the article I linked above, the first one being Robert Lanza talking about his theory of Biocentrism in a nutshell. The other one at the bottom is an episode of Through the Wormhole which is altogether a very fascinating series about the questions of cutting-edge science and always representing a very sober view, not pretending science already knew all the answers and thus steering clear of any dogmatism - even if the materialists also get a word in it.

So... if consciousness is the insubstantial "substance" the universe arises from as I firmly believe, does it mean that "we are all one", as some spiritual folks would have it? My personal answer would be a resounding NO!
We are certainly in some sense connected through this proto-consciousness, but no more than we are connected in the physical world. Physically, we are depending on the biosphere of this planet, we all breathe the same air, our bodies share the same chemistry as and are part of the rest of the Earth's biosphere which constitutes the kind of "substrate" we live off. For our souls there exists a similar kind of "substrate" we are rooted in like trees in the soil, yet still they are individual trees - and trees can even be at war with each other, one killing the other to take their place (watch The Secret Life of Plants to see for yourself, plants are not boring creatures at all!).
In any case trees can be vastly different from one another, some bright and delicate, others dark and brooding; all may be part of the same forest but they are not one.
Our souls are connected by sharing the same world of experience and very similar language - ultimately, all human languages are very similar at least in their function, in naming objects and conditions from our world of experience, such as grass, sky, fire, cold, freedom, beautiful, sad, etc., categorizing them and making connections between them. It is this same substrate that also forms the world we experience in our dreams - the other side of the mirror.
By the way, the same night I dreamed about the endless series of "now" I later had a lucid episode, looking at a dark, largely deserted downtown market square of the future with a huge freight train rumbling through but there were no rails; then after flying away I ended up at a sort of bus stop where I found a huge plush bunny, I stepped on its head to rip its ears off and then pushed it with its nose onto a nail protruding from the wall. I hate bunnies. LOL


...It is always "now". A pity to be so rarely aware of it...